0 min read

Empowerment how?

Empowerment how?

Written by

Published on

July 1, 2018

We analyzed how the 14 Donor Tracker countries, all members of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, fund gender equality and women's empowerment globally, as well as their policy priorities in this area and how well they track it. The 14 donors covered are: Australia, Canada, EU institutions, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Norway, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom (UK), and United States (US). Some of the key findings include: 

  • Donors are increasingly prioritizing gender equality in their development policies: 12 out of the 14 donors profiled have a gender equality strategy in place, and all have launched initiatives targeting women’s empowerment in recent years. However, only two donors – Sweden and Canada – have put gender equality at the heart of their development policies within an overarching ‘feminist’ approach.
  • Donors focus on advancing gender equality in similar areas: All 14 donors specify economic empowerment of women and ending gender-based violence as focus areas. Women’s participation in decision making (11 donors), peace and security (11 donors), and sexual and reproductive health and rights (10 donors) are other priorities.
  • Collectively, the 14 donors spent US$34.6 billion in 2016 on projects that target gender equality as a ‘significant’ or ‘principal’ objective: This corresponds to 28% of their total bilateral ODA (US$124.5 billion; see Figure 1). The largest donors were the US (US$6.6 billion), Germany (US$5.6 billion), the UK (US$5.4 billion), and the EU institutions (US$4.7 billion).
  • Considering only ODA that has gender equality as the principal objective, donors spent considerably less: US$4.6 billion in 2016, or 4% of their collective bilateral ODA. The US spent the most (US$2.0 billion) in 2016, followed by the UK (US$603 million), Sweden (US$411 million), and the Netherlands (US$396 million). Italy spent the least in absolute terms (US$16 million), according to the OECD gender marker.
  • All 14 donors use the OECD gender equality policy marker to some extent to assess their bilateral ODA: On aggregate, 87% of the donors’ ODA in 2016 was screened against the gender equality marker. This is positive, as the use of the marker is the basis for comparing gender equality-targeted spending across donors.
  • However, application of the gender equality marker varies between donors: Seven donors (Canada, EU Institutions, Netherlands, Norway, South Korea, UK, US) screen all bilateral ODA against the marker. Four donors screen between 70% and 96% of their ODA (Australia, France, Japan, Spain); three donors (Italy, Germany, Sweden) screen only 70% or less. These differences create an incomplete picture of how much funding is available.

Related Publications

Be the first to know. Get our expert analyses directly in your inbox.

Our team of country experts and analysts bring you fresh content every week to help you drive impact.

Enter your email

By clicking Sign Up you're confirming that you agree with our Terms and Conditions .

Our Analyses

Donor Profiles
Issue Summaries
Policy UpdatesPublicationsUkraine ODA Tracker



SEEK Development

The Donor Tracker is an initiative by SEEK Development


SEEK DevelopmentCotheniusstrasse 310407 BerlinGermany

2023 Donor Tracker All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyImprintJoin the Team