Policy Updates

On March 19, 2025, reports emerged that officials from the US Trump administration have developed a proposal to overhaul the US international assistance and development architecture following the recent dissolution of USAID.

The plan aimed to create a more streamlined approach, positioning US efforts to better counter China's influence globally. Key components include renaming USAID to the US Agency for International Humanitarian Assistance, significantly narrowing its focus to global health, food security, and disaster response, while embedding it within the State Department.

The proposal also suggested consolidating the MCC and the US Trade and Development Agency under the US International Development Finance Corporation, creating a unified entity dedicated to promoting private sector investment in infrastructure, energy, and technology. Additionally, it proposes relocating politically oriented programs, such as democracy promotion and anti-human trafficking initiatives, under the State Department.

Criticizing existing US development programming as “inefficient and fragmented,” the plan advocated for a more targeted strategy that fosters stability in regions vital to US interests. It emphasizes setting end dates for aid programs, measuring their success, and proposed using blockchain technology for enhanced accountability. This proposal follows significant changes to USAID, indicating a potential revitalization of critical programs aimed at combating infectious diseases and ensuring food security.

On March 18, 2025, a federal judge ruled that DOGE efforts to dismantle USAID are likely unconstitutional.

Judge Theodore D. Chuang, of the US District Court for the District of Maryland, criticized Senior Advisor to the President Elon Musk’s unappointed role in the process, stating that it violated the Appointments Clause of the Constitution.

The Trump administration, with Musk’s involvement, had begun shutting down the USAID headquarters and terminating the vast majority of staff. The judge ordered an immediate halt to these actions and the restoration of system access for USAID staff.

However, the ruling also noted that such actions could continue with the express approval of a USAID official with the proper legal authority. Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that he had taken control of the agency on February 3, 2025, delegating authority to Pete Marocco, the director of foreign assistance.

On March 18, 2025, Peter Marocco, the person largely responsible for driving the dismantling of USAID, pronounced 'Phase II' of the US foreign assistance review done and returned to his role as director of the Office of Foreign Assistance at the State Department, where he is expected to maintain influence over the ongoing reconfiguration of USAID.

Marocco announced via email that Jeremy Lewin, a staffer from DOGE, has been appointed as the deputy administrator for management and resources and chief financial officer. Kenneth Jackson, a recent political appointee, has been appointed as the deputy administrator for management and resources and chief financial officer.

Marocco reflected in a missive on his tenure at USAID, asserting that the agency has become “accountable and stable,” and expressed his intention to restore value to American foreign assistance.

On March 18, 2025, the Bundesrat approved changes to the constitutionally enshrined debt brake, which allowed for a vote on March 21, 2025, on an amendment outlining increased defense spending, a EUR500 billion (US$541.1 billion) infrastructure investment package, and the launch of a historic overhaul to boost defense and infrastructure investments.

The amendment was passed by the outgoing parliament with a two-thirds majority, circumventing the debt brake, which capped annual borrowing at 0.35% of GDP. This decision represents a political deviation from likely chancellor Friedrich Merz, who previously supported the debt brake.

The agreement comprises three pillars: defense spending capped at 1% of GDP, with additional financing through debt; a EUR500 billion (US$541.1 billion) special fund over 12 years for infrastructure, climate protection, and economic transformation; and increased borrowing leeway for federal states. Initiated by the Greens, the definition of defense spending now includes civil and disaster protection, intelligence, aid to countries attacked in violation of international law, and information security. The package includes EUR3 billion (US$3.2 billion) in military assistance for Ukraine, easing future constraints on support.

The increased fiscal leeway is expected to relieve the general budget by EUR20 billion (US$21.6 billion) in 2025, but development funding cuts remain likely due to CDU/CSU's insistence on budget consolidation. The CDU aims to reduce ODA spending to 0.35% ODA/GNI, but SPD pushback may keep it above 0.5%.

Economically, loosening the debt brake is projected to boost German growth, potentially increasing output by over 2% annually over the next decade.

On March 10, 2025, Norway announced agreements worth NOK 248 million (US$ 23.14 million) to support 27 renewable energy projects, involving both Norwegian and international companies.

Norwegian Minister of International Development Åsmund Aukrust emphasized that these investments are vital for reducing poverty and achieving global climate goals, aiming to enhance access to clean energy, create jobs, and stimulate economic growth.

Administered by Norad, the business support scheme for renewable energy is announced annually and encourages private investment in clean energy solutions. Norad Director General Bård Vegar Solhjell noted that early-phase support has been crucial for significant investments in the sector.

The funding will be directed towards solar, wind, hydropower, and clean cooking stove projects in countries such as Zambia, Nigeria, Malawi, Cameroon, Uganda, Senegal, South Africa, Indonesia, and Nepal.

On February 28, 2025, the UK government set out to reduce ODA from 0.5% to 0.3% of the GNI by 2027, or approximately GBP6 billion (US$7.8 billion), with the intention to bolster their defense spending.

This cut comes just 5 months after UK Primer Minister Keir Starmer promised at the UN that it would be a leading development contributor. This is further complicated by the fact that of this budget allocation, around 40% has historically been used to cover housing and administrative costs for refugees, meaning the true international ODA spending is far smaller.

On February 20, 2025, Dutch Minister for Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation Reinette Klever unveiled a significant overhaul of the Netherlands' development strategy, marking a decisive shift toward prioritizing national interests over traditional development programs.

Under the new policy, funding for initiatives supporting women's rights, higher education, sports, and culture will be eliminated, reflecting a broader trend of cutting back on sectors perceived as less 'directly beneficial' to Dutch taxpayers. Klever stated that all future development assistance must directly contribute to so-called 'Dutch interests', focusing specifically on trade, security, and migration concerns.

The strategic pivot entails a structural reduction of EUR2.4 billion (US$2.6 billion) annually from 2027, leaving EUR3.8 billion (US$4.1 billion) available for targeted aid that fosters trade partnerships and enhances safety in regions such as West Africa and the Middle East, where Klever noted 80% of global conflicts occur.

The sectors facing the most significant cuts were gender equality and cultural programs. Klever emphasized that the new approach aims to combat issues like people smuggling and provide support for refugees in their home regions, thereby alleviating migration pressures on the Netherlands. She expressed a preference for collaborating with smaller, locally based organizations rather than larger NGOs, which she deemed bureaucratic and inefficient. Despite the substantial cuts, Klever emphasized that the Dutch government is committed to continuing humanitarian assistance, ensuring that assistance reaches those in need effectively.

On February 18, 2025, JICA signed a Contribution Agreement with the IDB and IDB Invest, pledging up to US$1.5 billion to the TADAC.

This project aims to support private sector initiatives in the region to help narrow the financing gap for the SDGs commitments within the region, as out of 169 SDGs targets, the region is currently only on track to meet 30 by 2030.

On February 17, 2025, Norway announced the establishment of six new strategic partnership agreements with prominent Norwegian humanitarian organizations, including the Norwegian Refugee Council, NORCAP, Norwegian Church Aid, Norwegian Red Cross, Norwegian People’s Aid, and Save the Children Norway.

Originally established in 2020, the underlying support scheme for the strategic partnerships was extended for another five-year period through 2029. These agreements will provide NOK1.9 billion (US$177 million) annually to support rapid, flexible, and targeted humanitarian aid in response to unprecedented global needs. Norwegian Minister of International Development Åsmund Aukrust highlighted the critical nature of humanitarian assistance, noting that the UN estimates 300 million people will require aid in 2025. The agreements aim to save lives, alleviate suffering, and protect human rights in crisis situations, while ensuring adherence to humanitarian principles.

The selected organizations were chosen for their ability to deliver prompt assistance and their established presence in conflict and crisis zones. This strategic selection process aims to maximize the effectiveness of Norway's humanitarian funding. The agreements, established under a support scheme extended from 2025 to 2029, will be finalized in the coming weeks, reinforcing Norway’s dedication to promoting stability and respect for international humanitarian law worldwide.

On February 12, 2025, the Swedish Government presented its Foreign Declaration, which emphasized local area security, trade, and regional issues while refraining from criticizing the Trump administration's development policies.

The declaration continues to describe gender equality as a core value but shifted focus towards economic empowerment rather than rights, with insufficient references to the UN's agenda for women, peace, and security.

Concord raised concerns regarding Sweden's commitment to global humanitarian issues during a time of heightened international instability, particularly in lights of the omissions of US criticisms. The decision not to mention the Trump administration's saga against USAID was noted as particularly striking, undermining Sweden's potential impact on global development efforts.

Concord also criticized that the climate crisis was inadequately addressed as a security concern, and the declaration lacked urgency in responding to the needs of those most affected by climate change. While affirming that international law and human rights are foundational to Sweden's foreign policy, Concord asserted that the government has not fully recognized CSOs as agents of change, limiting their role to that of providers of humanitarian assistance.

Concord applauded that, according to the declaration the government intends to focus on "forgotten crises" such as those in the DRC and Sudan, but the reduction of support for development and peacebuilding in these regions raised concerns about the effectiveness of integrated approaches necessary for long-term solutions.

Although the Swedish government aims to maintain its status as a significant humanitarian donor, recent cuts to development budgets threaten to compromise Sweden's contributions to global development. Concord called on the Swedish government to articulate a clear strategy that balances national interests with global responsibilities.